| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 163.18 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A discussão do desempenho dos governos é tão antiga como os próprios governos.
A avaliação e gestão de desempenho institucional tem ganho espaço, devido às
vantagens que estes sistemas integram nas instituições públicas. Entre outras, a melhoria
da accountability mostra-se uma das vantagens associadas à implementação de sistemas
de avaliação e gestão de desempenho. Contudo, muitos modelos de avaliação e
gestão de desempenho acabam por ser modelos genéricos de gestão pública ou modelos
demasiado específicos, destinados a avaliar determinado serviço, órgão ou país. O
modelo mais consensual é a framework criada por Bouckaert e Halligan, pois foca a sua
análise nas componentes específicas de cada instituição (medição, incorporação e utilização
de informação) e, relacionando-as entre si, cria quatro tipos/níveis de avaliação e
gestão de desempenho: Performance Administration, Managements of Performances,
Performance Management e Performance Governance. De forma a contribuir para a literatura
nacional e internacional e alertar para a necessidade de desenvolvimento dos
sistemas avaliação e gestão de desempenho, aplicar-se-á a framework de Bouckaert e
Halligan às Câmaras Municipais do Distrito de Bragança, para determinar qual o tipo de
avaliação e gestão de desempenho presente no distrito. Realizar-se-á uma avaliação
qualitativa, mediante a recolha de informação documental e de inquéritos por entrevista
aos Presidentes de Câmara Municipal (em 2018). Para tal, será elaborado um guião de
entrevista, resultante da revisão de literatura, que abarque os aspetos essenciais para
permitir a identificação do tipo de avaliação e gestão de desempenho institucional, de
acordo com a framework de Bouckaert e Halligan.
The discussion of government performance is as old as governments themselves. The evaluation and management of institutional performance has gained space, due to the advantages that these systems integrate in public institutions. Among others, improving accountability is one of the advantages associated with the implementation of performance evaluation and management systems. However, many evaluation and performance management models turn out to be either generic public management models or models that are too narrow, intending to evaluate a specific service, institution or country. The most consensual model is the framework designed by Bouckaert and Halligan, focusing the analysis in each institution’s specific components (measurement, incorporation and information usage) and the correlation between them generates four types/levels of performance: Performance Administration, Managements of Performances, Performance Management and Performance Governance. In order to contribute to the Portuguese literature and to alert to the need of development of the evaluation and performance management systems, we intend to apply the Bouckaert and Halligan framework to the Municipalities of the District of Bragança to determine the type of performance management present in the district. A qualitative evaluation will be carried out, through the collection of information, namely through the collection of documents and interviews with the City Councilmen (in 2018). To do so, an interview guide will be developed, resulting from the literature review, covering the essential aspects that will allow, according to the framework of Bouckaert and Halligan, the identification of the institution’s type of performance management.
The discussion of government performance is as old as governments themselves. The evaluation and management of institutional performance has gained space, due to the advantages that these systems integrate in public institutions. Among others, improving accountability is one of the advantages associated with the implementation of performance evaluation and management systems. However, many evaluation and performance management models turn out to be either generic public management models or models that are too narrow, intending to evaluate a specific service, institution or country. The most consensual model is the framework designed by Bouckaert and Halligan, focusing the analysis in each institution’s specific components (measurement, incorporation and information usage) and the correlation between them generates four types/levels of performance: Performance Administration, Managements of Performances, Performance Management and Performance Governance. In order to contribute to the Portuguese literature and to alert to the need of development of the evaluation and performance management systems, we intend to apply the Bouckaert and Halligan framework to the Municipalities of the District of Bragança to determine the type of performance management present in the district. A qualitative evaluation will be carried out, through the collection of information, namely through the collection of documents and interviews with the City Councilmen (in 2018). To do so, an interview guide will be developed, resulting from the literature review, covering the essential aspects that will allow, according to the framework of Bouckaert and Halligan, the identification of the institution’s type of performance management.
Description
Keywords
Avaliação Gestão; Performance Institucional Accountability
Citation
Magalhães, Nuno; Costa, Cláudia S.; Fernandes, Joana (2018). Desempenho institucional e accountability: um retrato dos municípios do distrito de Bragança = Institutional performance and accountability: a picture of the municipalities of the district of Bragança. In Martins, Anabela (Coord.) V Encontro de Investigadores do Instituto Politécnico de Bragança: livro de resumos. Bragança: Instituto Politécnico. ISBN 978-972-745-235-4