| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.54 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Os indicadores de qualidade e a maior divulgação internacional têm levado à procura do Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (IPB) por parte de alunos estrangeiros, em regime de Erasmus, Mobilidade, entre outras modalidades, bem como por mais estudantes portugueses. Em pouco tempo, tal cenário levou a maior dificuldade para os estudantes de arrendar alojamentos, devido a suposta falta de oferta do mercado imobiliário na cidade e, consequentemente, ao aumento dos preços das rendas praticadas nos alojamentos existentes.
Numa tentativa de se amenizar o problema, foram definidas cinco potenciais soluções para estudo em termos técnicos e econômicos de alojamentos destinados a estudantes, nomeadamente: uma edificação existente, mas com necessidades de reabilitação; dois edifícios novos construídos com processos construtivos convencionais; e duas alternativas de construção modular, a integrar no campus do IPB, que envolvem a adaptação de Contentores Marítimos e recurso a construção com Light Steel Framming (LSF). Para cada hipótese, foram atendidos os condicionalismos técnicos inerentes a cada solução, sendo a análise SWOT a ferramenta escolhida para a avaliação analítica dos casos. Por sua vez, na análise econômica procedeu-se ao estudo atendendo ao retorno financeiro do investimento considerando o VAL (Valor Atual Líquido) de cada alternativa. A avaliação dos cenários foi feita anualmente e em intervalos pré-definidos, de forma a antever a renda mínima a ser cobrada no ano atual (ano zero). Além disso, o Tempo Mínimo de Retorno, o Custo por Alojamento e o Saldo Final também foram demonstrados, para os mesmos períodos, sendo a sua contabilização por meio de contas mensais inclusas e não-inclusas.
Os resultados demonstram que do ponto de vista técnico, as alternativas de construção modular implantadas no interior do campus do IPB seriam as mais simples, sustentáveis e facilmente reversíveis. No entanto, a análise econômica demonstrou que para a renda mínima (com e sem contas mensais), sob o ponto de vista do estudante, a melhor alternativa é a Construção Convencional em Formarigos, principalmente em virtude do processo construtivo difundido e da menor dimensão do empreendimento, o que resulta em custo de investimento reduzido com baixos custos de exploração. Já sobre a perspectiva do investidor, a maior renda seria praticada na Construção Convencional do Edifício Diogo, destacando-se o custo de investimento elevado proveniente de uma melhor qualidade de construção, sendo esta a alternativa com maior tempo de retorno para recuperação do investimento. Alternativamente, o tempo mínimo de retorno (TMR) apenas confirma os resultados apontados na renda mínima, onde o TMR com maior probabilidade de sucesso se trata da construção convencional em menor escala.
Em relação ao Custo por Alojamento, a alternativa mais viável é a que envolve a Reabilitação de Prédio da Igreja, dada a pré-existência da edificação. O saldo final para cada renda mínima e TR definidos também foi ilustrado, o qual confirma os resultados de custos por alojamento.
Quality indicators and greater international exposure have led to the search for the Polytechnic Institute of Bragança (IPB) by foreign students, under Erasmus, Mobility, among other modalities, as well as by more portuguese students. In a short time, this scenario led to the greatest difficulty for students to rent accommodation, due to the supposed lack of supply of the real estate market in the city and, consequently, to the increase in rent prices in existing accommodation. In an attempt to alleviate the problem, five potential solutions for technical and economic study of student housing were defined, namely: an existing building, but with rehabilitation needs; two new buildings built using conventional building processes; and two modular construction alternatives, to be integrated on the IPB campus, which involve the adaptation of Maritime Containers and the use of Light Steel Framming (LSF) construction. For each hypothesis, the technical constraints inherent to each solution were met and SWOT analysis was the chosen tool for the analytical evaluation of the cases. In turn, the economic analysis proceeded to the study taking into account the financial return on investment considering the NPV (Net Present Value) of each alternative. The scenarios were evaluated annually and at predefined intervals, in order to predict the minimum rent to be charged in the current year (year zero). In addition, the Minimum Return Time, Cost per Accommodation and the Final Balance were also shown for the same periods, being accounted for through included and non-included monthly accounts. The results demonstrate that from a technical standpoint, the modular construction alternatives deployed within the IPB campus would be the simplest, most sustainable and easily reversible. However, the economic analysis showed that for the minimum income (with and without monthly bills), from the student's point of view, the best alternative is Conventional Construction in Formarigos, mainly due to the widespread construction process and the smaller size of the project. which results in reduced investment cost with low operating costs. From the investor's perspective, the highest income would be charged to the Diogo Building Conventional Construction, highlighting the high investment cost from a better construction quality, which is the alternative with the highest return time for investment recovery. Alternatively, the minimum turnaround time (TMR) only confirms the results shown in the minimum income, where the most likely TMR is the smaller scale conventional construction. Regarding the Cost per Accommodation, the most viable alternative is the one involving the Rehabilitation of Church Building, given the pre-existence of the building. The final balance for each defined minimum income and TR was also illustrated, which confirms the cost per accommodation results.
Quality indicators and greater international exposure have led to the search for the Polytechnic Institute of Bragança (IPB) by foreign students, under Erasmus, Mobility, among other modalities, as well as by more portuguese students. In a short time, this scenario led to the greatest difficulty for students to rent accommodation, due to the supposed lack of supply of the real estate market in the city and, consequently, to the increase in rent prices in existing accommodation. In an attempt to alleviate the problem, five potential solutions for technical and economic study of student housing were defined, namely: an existing building, but with rehabilitation needs; two new buildings built using conventional building processes; and two modular construction alternatives, to be integrated on the IPB campus, which involve the adaptation of Maritime Containers and the use of Light Steel Framming (LSF) construction. For each hypothesis, the technical constraints inherent to each solution were met and SWOT analysis was the chosen tool for the analytical evaluation of the cases. In turn, the economic analysis proceeded to the study taking into account the financial return on investment considering the NPV (Net Present Value) of each alternative. The scenarios were evaluated annually and at predefined intervals, in order to predict the minimum rent to be charged in the current year (year zero). In addition, the Minimum Return Time, Cost per Accommodation and the Final Balance were also shown for the same periods, being accounted for through included and non-included monthly accounts. The results demonstrate that from a technical standpoint, the modular construction alternatives deployed within the IPB campus would be the simplest, most sustainable and easily reversible. However, the economic analysis showed that for the minimum income (with and without monthly bills), from the student's point of view, the best alternative is Conventional Construction in Formarigos, mainly due to the widespread construction process and the smaller size of the project. which results in reduced investment cost with low operating costs. From the investor's perspective, the highest income would be charged to the Diogo Building Conventional Construction, highlighting the high investment cost from a better construction quality, which is the alternative with the highest return time for investment recovery. Alternatively, the minimum turnaround time (TMR) only confirms the results shown in the minimum income, where the most likely TMR is the smaller scale conventional construction. Regarding the Cost per Accommodation, the most viable alternative is the one involving the Rehabilitation of Church Building, given the pre-existence of the building. The final balance for each defined minimum income and TR was also illustrated, which confirms the cost per accommodation results.
Description
Dupla diplomação com a UTFPR - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
Keywords
Alojamento estudantil Viabilidade técnica e econômica Construção modular Construção convencional Reabilitação de edifício Tempo de retorno Renda mínima Custo por alojamento