Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparative study before and after innovative learning methodology: a qualitative analysis of health students' perceptions

dc.contributor.authorPinto, Isabel C.
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida-de-Souza, Juliana
dc.contributor.authorVeiga-Branco, Augusta
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Olívia R.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-31T09:25:22Z
dc.date.available2020-03-31T09:25:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe actives learning methodologies appears as new education policies and those hold students accountable for their own learning. Also a growing number of study results are finding positive relationships between active methodologies and student learning. In this sense, it is important to understand the perceptions of innovative process experiences in learning. Aims: Create a qualitative analysis about student perceptions during an implementation of co-creation methodology in curricular units of Dietetics Nutrition and Pharmacy graduations. Methods: It is a qualitative and longitudinal study in 3rd year degree students across one semester. A co-creation pedagogical process was performed including a multidisciplinary group of students from 4 different subjects of the undergraduate courses in Dietetics Nutrition and Pharmacy, School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Portugal. Throughout the semester, students had to develop a multidisciplinary research project. Co-creation events, guided by subject teachers, took place at four different times: kick-off, jam1, jam2 and final-pitch. The students' perception of the teaching-learning process was evaluated in the end of each event, through an online open response questionnaire. The discursive components of the first and last event were subjected to content analysis from which emerged a categorical tree with 5 and 3 categories, respectively. Results: In first moment, the categorical tree revels 7 main categories (and its components), which identify words just mean the concepts related with the classic paradigm of learning-teaching process: 1st) Team (19), 2nd) Knowledge (17), 3rd) Learning (11) and Companionship (11), 5th) Sharing (9), 6th) New/Different (7), 7th) Interaction (6). (figure 1 - left) In last moment, the categorical tree revels 3 main categories (and its components): 1st) Learning in Insight (17), helps explain how students learn through socialization, acceptance and understanding of adhering to new methodologies and, this first category generates 2 subcategories: Reviewing in Presentations and Projects and The New/The Innovator. 2nd) The feeling of integration in interaction (15), helps explains interaction, communication, expertise opinions and, this second category generates 3 subcategories: Interaction (7), The Team (4), and The Sharing (4). 3rd) Learning (10) is the only category that corroborates first moment. (figure 1 - right). Conclusion: Only "new" words appear - in the sense of innovation - after the experience is lived. This proves that it is not possible to explain to students a methodology, in theoretical terms. Only in this way it is possible to create awareness about an experience.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationPinto, Isabel C.; Almeida-de-Souza, Juliana; Veiga-Branco, Maria Augusta; Pereira, Olívia R. (2020) Comparative study before and after innovative learning methodology: a qualitative analysis of health students' perceptions. In International Conference on Co-Creation Processes in Higher Education. Bragançapt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/21247
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherInstituto Politécnico de Bragançapt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectCo-creation pedagogical processpt_PT
dc.subjectDietetics Nutrition and Pharmacy studentspt_PT
dc.subjectStudents' perceptionspt_PT
dc.titleComparative study before and after innovative learning methodology: a qualitative analysis of health students' perceptionspt_PT
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceBragançapt_PT
oaire.citation.titleInternational Conference on Co-Creation Processes in Higher Educationpt_PT
person.familyNamePinto
person.familyNameAlmeida-de-Souza
person.familyNameVeiga-Branco
person.familyNamePereira
person.givenNameIsabel C.
person.givenNameJuliana
person.givenNameAugusta
person.givenNameOlívia R.
person.identifier145216
person.identifier.ciencia-id851B-247F-C650
person.identifier.ciencia-idFA14-073E-C116
person.identifier.ciencia-idB312-AF21-D2FA
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4745-6489
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2578-3684
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7963-2291
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6275-3134
person.identifier.ridH-1049-2014
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57194551953
person.identifier.scopus-author-id52264387000
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication751d74ab-e27c-4713-97ba-62cad38d1890
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9d064d3f-d90d-41e9-b993-297a4e808396
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf46b8e1b-dd54-4ae1-9056-3bae4625a6cc
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione8fdab9a-3ad6-47e6-b90c-7a37aabcb453
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye8fdab9a-3ad6-47e6-b90c-7a37aabcb453

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
In2cop_Comparative study before and after innovative learning_Poster.pdf
Size:
603.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: