| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Multiple runs of a river basin model produced information about water allocation under different users’ priorities, creating a set of allocation scenarios as possible decision alternatives. To identify the most desired scenario that will, expectedly, be more readily accepted and implemented, involvement of stakeholders and reaching the consensus among them in evaluating scenarios are essential. This article describes methodology for integrating multi-criteria optimization as an efficient tool for the evaluation of scenarios in a group context, with river basin simulation-optimization models. Methodology was developed within the scope of the bilateral project Serbia–Portugal, and it consisted of five phases: defining the preference schemes of allocation, running the ACQUANET model, evaluating the criteria and strategies with analytic hierarchy process, aggregation and initial search for consensus in subgroups, and obtaining the final consensus converged result (best management strategy). The approach was tested on the water allocation problem in the Nadela watershed in Vojvodina Province in Serbia, with participation of 23 stakeholders. Promising results recommended the approach for the testing in different conditions in the area near Bragança in northeast Portugal (Sabor watershed).
Description
Keywords
Citation
Srdjevic, Zorica; Srdjevic, Bojan; Melo, Paulo; Jorge, Luísa (2019). Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale. Die Bodenkultur: Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment. 70:3, p. 161-170
Publisher
Sciendo