Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

The triangle assessment method: a new procedure for eliciting expert judgement

dc.contributor.authorPérez-Rodríguez, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorRojo-Alboreca, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-16T09:58:48Z
dc.date.available2017-02-16T09:58:48Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThe Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the most widely used Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods worldwide. As such, it is subject to criticisms that highlight some potential weaknesses. In this study, we present a new Multi-Criteria Decision-Making method denominated the “Triangular Assessment Method” (referred to by its Spanish abbreviation, MTC©). The MTC© aims to make use of the potential of AHP while avoiding some of its drawbacks. The main characteristics and advantages of the MTC© can be summarised as follows: (i) evaluation of criteria, and of the alternative options for each criterion, in trios instead of pairs; (ii) elimination of discrete scales and values involved in judgements; (iii) a substantial reduction in the number of evaluations (trios) relative to the corresponding number of pairs which would have to be considered when applying the AHP method; (iv) consistent decision-making; (v) introduction of closed cyclical series for comparing criteria and alternatives; and (vi) the introduction of opinion vectors and opinion surfaces. This new method is recommended for supporting decision-making with large numbers of subjective criteria and/or alternatives and also for group decisions where the consensus must be evaluated. The MTC© provides a different promising perspective in decision-making and could lead to new research lines in the field of information systems.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Galician Regional Government [“Programa de Consolidación e Estructuración de Unidades de Investigación Competitivas, modalidade de Grupos de Referencia Competitiva” for the period 2006–2017] and by the European Union [ERDF program]. Likewise, the authors thank Daniele de Rigo, Dora Henriques and Cesar Pérez-Cruzado, because his comments improved notably this manuscript.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationPérez-Rodríguez, Fernando; Rojo-Alboreca, Alberto (2017). The triangle assessment method: a new procedure for eliciting expert judgement. Expert Systems with Applications. ISSN 0957-4174. 72, p. 139–150pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.021pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn0957-4174
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/14033
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectDecision support systemspt_PT
dc.subjectTriangular Assessment Methodpt_PT
dc.subjectMTC©pt_PT
dc.subjectJudgementspt_PT
dc.subjectGroup decisionspt_PT
dc.subjectAHPpt_PT
dc.titleThe triangle assessment method: a new procedure for eliciting expert judgementpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.titleExpert Systems with Applicationspt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
Pérez-Rodríguez and Rojo-Alboreca 2016.pdf
Tamanho:
7.67 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.75 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: