Repository logo
 
Publication

Quantifying sub-elite youth football weekly training load and recovery variation

2021Journal article Open access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, José Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorForte, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorFerraz, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorLeal, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Joana
dc.contributor.authorSilva, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Tiago M.
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, A.M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-27T14:04:34Z
dc.date.available2021-07-27T14:04:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractMonitoring the training load in football is an important strategy to improve athletic performance and an effective training periodization. The aim of this study was two-fold: (1) to quantify the weekly training load and recovery status variations performed by under-15, under-17 and under-19 sub-elite young football players; and (2) to analyze the influence of age, training day, weekly microcycle, training and playing position on the training load and recovery status. Twenty under-15, twenty under-17 and twenty under-19 players were monitored over a 2-week period during the first month of the 2019-2020 competitive season. Global positioning system technology (GPS) was used to collect external training loads: total distance covered, average speed, maximal running speed, relative high-speed running distance, high metabolic load distance, sprinting distance, dynamic stress load, accelerations and decelerations. Internal training load was monitored using ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE). Recovery status was obtained using the total quality recovery (TQR) scale. The results show an age-related influence for external training load (p <= 0.001; d = 0.29-0.86; moderate to strong effect), internal training load (p <= 0.001, d = 0.12-0.69; minimum to strong effect) and recovery status (p <= 0.001, d = 0.59; strong effect). The external training load presented differences between training days (p < 0.05, d = 0.26-0.95; moderate to strong effect). The playing position had a minimum effect on the weekly training load (p < 0.05; d = 0.06-0.18). The weekly microcycle had a moderate effect in the TD (p < 0.05, d = 0.39), RPE (p < 0.05; d = 0.35) and sRPE (p < 0.05, d = 0.35). Interaction effects were found between the four factors analyzed for deceleration (F = 2.819, p = 0.017) and between inter-day, inter-week and age for total covered distance (F = 8.342, p = 0.008). This study provided specific insights about sub-elite youth football training load and recovery status to monitor training environments and load variations. Future research should include a longer monitoring period to assess training load and recovery variations across different season phases.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the Douro Higher Institute of Educational Sciences and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. (project UIDB04045/2021). Documentpt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationTeixeira, J.E.; Forte, Pedro; Ferraz, R.; Leal, Miguel; Ribeiro, Joana; Silva, A.J.; Barbosa, Tiago M.; Monteiro, A.M. (2021). Quantifying sub-elite youth football weekly training load and recovery variation. Applied Sciences-Basel. ISSN 2076-3417. 11:11, p. 1-15pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app11114871pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/23770
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherMDPIpt_PT
dc.relationUIDB04045/2021pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectMonitoringpt_PT
dc.subjectWorkloadpt_PT
dc.subjectPerceived exertionpt_PT
dc.subjectSoccerpt_PT
dc.subjectPeriodizationpt_PT
dc.titleQuantifying sub-elite youth football weekly training load and recovery variationpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage15pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue11pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleApplied Sciencespt_PT
oaire.citation.volume11pt_PT
person.familyNameTeixeira
person.familyNameForte
person.familyNameBarbosa
person.familyNameMonteiro
person.givenNameJosé Eduardo
person.givenNamePedro
person.givenNameTiago M.
person.givenNameAntónio M.
person.identifier.ciencia-idD11C-9591-7A8A
person.identifier.ciencia-id351B-B16B-79C7
person.identifier.ciencia-id8B11-BDC4-F6FF
person.identifier.ciencia-idC41C-6CCD-A1F0
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4612-3623
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0184-6780
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7071-2116
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4467-1722
person.identifier.scopus-author-id10044856400
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication79042f92-ce53-4b79-a33f-76ac63c55b8d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3ecc6d1b-07a4-40d7-81f4-df6fd7b3d5b0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication941a6f14-cfba-458a-a2e3-0cbd1846cd42
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5b5d8601-e683-42d5-a1b5-c8e29a4e0a41
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery941a6f14-cfba-458a-a2e3-0cbd1846cd42

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
168.pdf
Size:
869.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

ESE - Artigos em Revistas Indexados à WoS/Scopus