Repository logo
 
Publication

Was culture a commodity ‘all’ Victorians Could Afford? – Notes on the first British public museums

2021Journal article Open access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Cláudia
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-25T08:18:31Z
dc.date.available2022-07-25T08:18:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe etymology of mouseion gave rise to the word ‘museum’ and initially referred to the temple of the Muses. It is noteworthy to recall that the first museum was the Alexandria Museum, set up by Ptolemy in 300 B.C., as a temple, a library, an astronomical observatory, an amphitheatre, a botanical garden and a research venue (Anico 105). The outset of museums can be found later on in private collections, which continued until mid-18th century. Additionally, with the Enlightenment and the French Revolution, museums started being regarded as an ally to combat myths, dogmata and superstitions and thus ‘Curiosity Cabinets’ were gradually replaced by the first public museums, such as the Galleria degli Uffizi (1571), in Florence, the British Museum (1753), in London, and the Louvre Museum (1793), in Paris. Simpson (126– 127) considers these new cultural spaces as a means for European powers to re-write their history and exhibit their past deeds, as well as a way to show off the heritage they unlawfully gathered in their colonial periods, in line with the 1851 Great Exhibition of the Works of Industry of all Nations, in London. Taking these assumptions into account, we aim at describing the birth of the first British public museums and the resources they wished to make available to their visitors (e.g. admission fees, facilities, lighting and guides), so as to reflect on the underlying concept of access to culture in Victorian mindset. Was culture a commodity then? In line with Kelly (Culture as Commodity), cultural products and services may have symbolic or even status-symbolic dimensions and this understanding leads us to a further question related to the target audiences of Victorian museums: Were they supposed to be accessible to everyone? Or were they merely for “the initiated” vs. “the primitive” (Chu)?pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationMartins, Cláudia (2021). Was culture a commodity ‘all’ Victorians Could Afford? – Notes on the first British public museums. Revista Anglo Saxonica. ISSN 2184-6006. 19:1, p. 1-16pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/as.42pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2184-6006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/25715
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherUbiquity Presspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectMuseum historypt_PT
dc.subjectMuseum accessibilitypt_PT
dc.subjectPublic museumspt_PT
dc.subjectSocial accessibilitypt_PT
dc.subjectCommodity culturept_PT
dc.titleWas culture a commodity ‘all’ Victorians Could Afford? – Notes on the first British public museumspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage16pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue19pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleAnglo Saxonicapt_PT
oaire.citation.volume1pt_PT
person.familyNameMartins
person.givenNameCláudia
person.identifier.ciencia-id5E13-B7EA-F261
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3388-2340
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57214068155
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4be85f99-b17e-4516-ae3d-b35381902076
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4be85f99-b17e-4516-ae3d-b35381902076

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2020-martins-wascultureacommodity.pdf
Size:
4.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

ESE - Artigos em Revistas Indexados à WoS/Scopus