Repository logo
 
Publication

Empirical Validation of the Dart Model in University Business Collaboration: We Working and Envisioning Co Creation Community of Practice

datacite.subject.fosCiências Sociais::Ciências da Educação
datacite.subject.sdg04:Educação de Qualidade
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Pedro M.
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Cláudia S.
dc.contributor.authorBarbedo, Inês
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Fernando A.
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida-de-Souza, Juliana
dc.contributor.authorBarroso, Bárbara
dc.contributor.authorAntão, Celeste
dc.contributor.authorLachovicz, Rebeca
dc.contributor.authorFerro-Lebres, Vera
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T14:58:15Z
dc.date.available2025-11-18T14:58:15Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractHigher Education faces significant challenges, including internationalization (Msomphora, 2025), digital transformation - in particular the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into traditional methods and cybersecurity (Parambil et al., 2024), students increasing expectations (Amanzhol et al., 2024), pressure for higher alumni employability rates (Schueller, 2023), the increased need of interdisciplinary approaches and for active faculty involvement in fostering sustainability education (Abo-Khalil, 2024). Higher education institutions (HEIs) are rethinking how they design learning experiences and engage with stakeholders (Gill and Singh, 2020). One of the most promising approaches in this scenario is Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) (Jackson and Dean, 2023), particularly the value co-creation methodologies, where learners, educators, and external partners actively collaborate in the production of educational experiences and innovations (Schmied et al., 2024). Analyzing HEI considering the Service-Dominant Logic (Vargo and Lusch, 2004), co-creation shifts the traditional paradigm of education delivery from a unidirectional model to one where all participants contribute meaningfully to shared outcomes. Beyond the higher-education challenges outlined above, a substantial WIL/WIE literature positions work integrated approaches as curriculum-embedded strategies to build graduate employability and professional identity while offering clear design guidance for programs and partnerships (Rowe & Zegwaard, 2017; Billett, 2024). Recent syntheses further consolidate definitions, models and quality indicators across sectors, providing an authoritative reference point for institutions scaling co-creation with industry (Zegwaard & Pretti, 2023). Within this theoretical landscape, the DART model—comprising Dialogue, Access, Risk Assessment, and Transparency—emerged as a practical framework to operationalize co-creation. The DART elements are designed to foster trust, engagement, and mutual learning, making them particularly relevant for higher education settings, where collaborative innovation and experiential learning are increasingly prioritized (Nagarethenam, Shamim and Ghazali, 2018). Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) and its closely related strand, Work-Integrated Education (WIE), emphasize intentional, curriculum-embedded collaboration among higher education institutions (HEIs), workplaces, and students to enhance employability, relevance, and innovation in teaching and learning. In this perspective, co-creation is not merely a pedagogical add-on but a governance logic that distributes agency and responsibility across actors. The DART model operationalizes co-creation by specifying relational and informational conditions under which HEIs and external partners can jointly design, deliver, and evaluate learning and innovation outcomes. Positioning DART within WIL/WIE clarifies how structured communication, equitable resource access, shared risk governance, and openness enable practical, scalable collaboration between universities and companies. This study extends that conversation by empirically testing a context-adapted DART scale with workplace partners engaged in a university–business co-creation program. A representative case in which the DART model can be applied is the WE: Working and Envisioning Community of Practice, particularly its Complex Challenge Based Learning activities, based on co-creation principles Bragança Polytechnic University | Instituto Politécnico de Bragança. WE is a faculty-led, cross institutional ecosystem that convenes professors-facilitators, students from diverse backgrounds, and external stakeholders to co-create solutions to complex, future-oriented challenges. Grounded in a culture of dialogue, trust, innovation, and critical thinking. WE operates on 8–12-week challenge cycles with a structured cadence: joint scoping with company representatives (week 0–1), iterative problem framing and prototyping with weekly checkpoints (weeks 2–10), and a final review delivering actionable insights or prototypes (weeks 11–12). Roles are codified – teachers acting as facilitators ensure process fidelity and responsiveness; company representatives guarantee access to data, facilities, and decision-makers; student teams own proactive communication and evidence-based proposals. Since 2017, the ecosystem has catalyzed regional engagement by coordinating more than 100 co-creation initiatives - reportedly 115 across research reports, prototypes, professional internships, and patents—thereby strengthening university–industry–society ties and generating practical outcomes for national and international development. Although the DART model has been widely cited in business literature, empirical validations of its structure in the context of educational co-creation are scarce. This study contributes to this gap by translating and testing a Portuguese version of the DART scale among external stakeholders participants in the WE Complex Challenge Based Learning program, aiming to understand how these stakeholders perceive value co-creation practices in a higher education setting. The outcomes offer not only theoretical contributions to the cocreation literature but also practical insights for institutions seeking to optimize their collaboration frameworks with external partners.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to acknowledge the funding from Erasmus+ Alliances for Education and Enterprises - “NEST - Co-Creating a New Form of Governance in Societal Transition for Healthy Living” (2023-2026) - ERASMUS-EDU-2022-PI-ALL-INNOEDU-ENTERP I PROPOSAL NUMBER: 101111656 - FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC): CIMO, UIDB/00690/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/UIDB/00690/ 2020) and UIDP/00690/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/UIDP/00690/2020), and SusTEC, LA/P/0007/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/LA/P/0007/2020).
dc.identifier.citationRodrigues, Pedro M.; Costa, Cláudia S.; Barbedo, Inês; Pereira, Fernando A.; Almeida-de-Souza, Juliana; Barroso, Bárbara; Antão, Celeste; Lachovicz, Rebeca; Ferro-Lebres, Vera (2025). Empirical Validation of the Dart Model in University Business Collaboration: We Working and Envisioning Co Creation Community of Practice. In WIL'25. 3rd International Conference of Work-Integrated Learning. Oslo. ISBN 978-91-89969-29-2
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-89969-29-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/35094
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publisherKristiana University
dc.relationMountain Research Center
dc.relationUIDP/00690/2020
dc.relationLA/P/0007/2020
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleEmpirical Validation of the Dart Model in University Business Collaboration: We Working and Envisioning Co Creation Community of Practicepor
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardTitleMountain Research Center
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00690%2F2020/PT
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceOslo
oaire.citation.endPage4
oaire.citation.startPage1
oaire.citation.titleWIL'25. 3rd International Conference of Work-Integrated Learning
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
person.familyNameRodrigues
person.familyNameCosta
person.familyNameBarbedo
person.familyNamePereira
person.familyNameAlmeida-de-Souza
person.familyNameBarroso
person.familyNameAntão
person.familyNameLachovicz
person.familyNameFerro-Lebres
person.givenNamePedro M.
person.givenNameCláudia S.
person.givenNameInês
person.givenNameFernando A.
person.givenNameJuliana
person.givenNameBárbara
person.givenNameCeleste
person.givenNameRebeca
person.givenNameVera
person.identifierX-5933-2018
person.identifier.ciencia-idC919-D413-5E83
person.identifier.ciencia-id2F1B-0FEA-A447
person.identifier.ciencia-id681B-7253-50B1
person.identifier.ciencia-idC51E-6B11-C82F
person.identifier.ciencia-idFA14-073E-C116
person.identifier.ciencia-id8B11-A2DC-CE51
person.identifier.ciencia-idD31A-8175-5254
person.identifier.ciencia-id3F19-7B8E-1D87
person.identifier.ciencia-idA913-E58F-DACE
person.identifier.orcid0009-0002-4920-7398
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8294-2218
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6350-9697
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3294-3084
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2578-3684
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6323-2309
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1721-5836
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3691-9791
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3782-9264
person.identifier.ridAAL-4392-2020
person.identifier.ridA-5556-2018
person.identifier.scopus-author-id56108282100
person.identifier.scopus-author-id25624613800
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57192927859
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57194551953
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
relation.isAuthorOfPublication55f77b39-347e-4ad5-97c6-def43d656014
relation.isAuthorOfPublication42f3bdca-06df-4ce1-8ec3-57fdbb7f3e62
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8a4e21c4-845a-4fb3-a772-bab297bae908
relation.isAuthorOfPublication126ec14b-f8f1-4c9e-ada8-1f75a5502c8a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9d064d3f-d90d-41e9-b993-297a4e808396
relation.isAuthorOfPublication312c6954-cbfd-4e75-896f-e748370eb39f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2e510c58-f864-4ebf-98cd-f58ceacbb012
relation.isAuthorOfPublication581b4da4-52fd-40df-9137-fb6bd34f44c7
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione5964a34-a9f3-41bd-8246-4014c7507f5a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery55f77b39-347e-4ad5-97c6-def43d656014
relation.isProjectOfPublication29718e93-4989-42bb-bcbc-4daff3870b25
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscovery29718e93-4989-42bb-bcbc-4daff3870b25

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Empirical Validation.pdf
Size:
3.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: