Repository logo
 
Publication

Practical study of bare metal virtualization solutions

dc.contributor.authorPousa, Duarte
dc.contributor.authorRufino, José
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-27T08:47:40Z
dc.date.available2020-07-27T08:47:40Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractWith the hardware breakthroughs accomplished through the years, the idea of software defined hardware has become a reality. Hypervisors such as KVM, Xen, Hyper-V and ESXi enable the cloud of today, with hardware consolidation bringing a reduction in operating costs. In this scope, it is imperative to address the performance of all the different virtualization implementations, in order to discover any potential bottlenecks and bugs. In this work, the performance of all the prominent Type-1 virtualization platforms is analyzed, using guests representative of the Windows NT and Linux kernels, in the form of Windows 10 LTSB and Ubuntu Server 16.04 LTS. The effectiveness of the CPU scheduler of each hypervisor is put to the test, as well as the storage backend performance under multiple scenarios (iSCSI, NFS and local). In short, this project provides a snapshot of the current state of the virtualization market, covering CPU, Memory, 2D & 3D Graphics performance of oVirt, Proxmox, XenServer, Hyper-V and VMware Vsphere. All the benchmarks were executed using their own default settings, with some automation scripts, in order to accelerate the process and exclude variability as much as possible. Among the selected benchmarks were: Passmark Performance Test 9 to benchmark Windows performance; Unixbench, providing a way to extrapolate the performance of Linux guests; (ez)FIO allowed in-depth analysis of filesystem performance across platforms. Concluding, there are a few generalizations that can be made from the information gathered: XenServer, oVirt and Proxmox require the presence of xentools/virtio in order to provide good I/O throughput; GPU passthrough provides native performance as long as there is no resource overcommitment; VMware's Vsphere provides impressive CPU performance, edging out the competition, with 98% of the native performance; Hyper-V offers mediocre 2D Desktop performance (28% of the native performance), as such, it should not be used in VMs that provide interactive desktops; Similarly, Hyper-V's performance plunges in memory related workloads, when compared to the remaining platforms and bare metal, with a mere 83%; The remote I/O results crown iSCSI as best performer, with double the performance of NFS; All the open source platforms (Proxmox, oVirt and XenServer) display impressive remote I/O performance, in both iSCSI and NFS.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationPousa, Duarte; Rufino, José (2017). Practical study of bare metal virtualization solutions. In eji v Encontro de Jovens Investigadores. Instituto Politécnico de Bragançapt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/22522
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewednopt_PT
dc.publisherInstituto Politécnico de Bragançapt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectBare metal virtualizationpt_PT
dc.subjectBenchmarkingpt_PT
dc.subjectPerformance assessmentpt_PT
dc.titlePractical study of bare metal virtualization solutionspt_PT
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceInstituto Politécnico de Bragançapt_PT
oaire.citation.titleeji v Encontro de Jovens Investigadorespt_PT
person.familyNameRufino
person.givenNameJosé
person.identifier.ciencia-idC414-F47F-6323
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1344-8264
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55947199100
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1e24d2ce-a354-442a-bef8-eebadd94b385
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1e24d2ce-a354-442a-bef8-eebadd94b385

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
eji2017-poster-duarte-pousa-jose-rufino.pdf
Size:
2.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format