Repository logo
 
Publication

Barriers and incentives for uptake of diagnostics for sustainable worm control by European dairy cattle farmers

2020Conference object Open access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorVande Velde, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorHektoen, Lisbeth
dc.contributor.authorPhytian, Clare
dc.contributor.authorRinaldi, Laura
dc.contributor.authorBosco, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorHinney, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorStrube, Christina
dc.contributor.authorMay, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorKnubben-Schweizer, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Oliva M.D.
dc.contributor.authorMatheus, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorSimion, Violeta
dc.contributor.authorCharlier, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorBartley, Dave
dc.contributor.authorClaerebout, Edwin
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-02T10:16:34Z
dc.date.available2022-05-02T10:16:34Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractTo mitigate emerging anthelmintic resistance in cattle, sustainable worm control strategies should be adopted, such as the use of diagnostic methods to take informed treatment decisions. To understand the factors affecting European farmers’ intention to adopt diagnostic methods and to gauge for differences between European regions, a theoretical framework, based on theories in the field of behavioural psychology and health psychology, was validated through a questionnaire survey, carried out in dairy farms in 6 European countries. Despite insufficient data from 2 countries and several confounders prohibiting statistical comparisons between countries, three models were developed, which allowed to describe general trends and differences between regions. Data from Northern-(Norway) and Central-Europe (Austria and Germany) resulted in two similar models, which differed in 3 questions. Southern Europe’s (Italy) data were more difficult to align with the conceptual model and several factors were deleted to fit the model. In all models, subjective norms, affected by a bandwagon bias, had the largest influence on farmers’ adoption intention. Perception of anthelmintic resistance had no effect on adoption intention for Northern and Central, but to some extent for Southern Europe. In Northern and Central Europe, attitude towards anthelmintics had a negative effect on adoption intention, while attitude towards diagnostics had a positive effect. Both types of attitudes were affected by the default bias. Finally, by combining self-reported practices for Northern and Central Europe, a larger effect of descriptive norms on farmers’ actual adoption of diagnostics was observed, compared to adoption intention and the default bias.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipCOST EUpt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationVelde, F.Vande; Hectoen, L.; Phytian, C.; J. Rinaldi, L.; Bosco, A.; Hinney, B.; Strube, C.; May, K.; Knubben-Schweizer, G.; Martins, Oliva M.D.; Matheus, T.; Simon, V. E.; Charlier, J.; Bartley, D.; Claerebout, E. (2020). Barriers and incentives for uptake of diagnostics for sustainable worm control by European dairy cattle farmers. In 4 th Joint COMBAR WG meetings: “Anthelmintic Resistance in Ruminants: from Research to Recommendations”. Onlinept_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/25407
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.relationMemorandum of Understanding for the implementation of the COST Action 􂀜Combatting anthelmintic resistance in ruminants􂀝 (COMBAR) CA16230pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.combar-ca.eu/sites/default/files/Abstractbook_COMBAR4thWG.pdfpt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.titleBarriers and incentives for uptake of diagnostics for sustainable worm control by European dairy cattle farmerspt_PT
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceonlinept_PT
oaire.citation.title4 th Joint COMBAR WG meetings: “Anthelmintic Resistance in Ruminants: from Research to Recommendations”pt_PT
person.familyNameMartins
person.givenNameOliva M.D.
person.identifier1025091
person.identifier.ciencia-id221F-FF93-8879
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2958-691X
person.identifier.ridJ-5951-2015
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55324743500
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfaaf8b5a-a36d-41ef-89e1-34772e67a535
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfaaf8b5a-a36d-41ef-89e1-34772e67a535

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
COMBAR_2020.pdf
Size:
2.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

ESTiG - Resumos em Proceedings Não Indexados à WoS/Scopus