Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparison between FTIR-ATR and NIR spectroscopy for Lavandula honey characterization

dc.contributor.authorAnjos, Ofélia
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Ana Paula
dc.contributor.authorSantos, António J.A.
dc.contributor.authorEstevinho, Leticia M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-26T10:59:26Z
dc.date.available2018-04-26T10:59:26Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractSpectroscopic methods have been widely used in the quality assessment of different matrices, among which food products [1,2,3]. The advantage of these analytical techniques is related to the minimal or no sample preparation, quickness of the procedure and potential to run multiple tests with only one sample. However, different methodologies may be applied, emphasizing the importance of identifying the most accurate method and equipment. The aim of this work was to compare the performance of Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) and Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopic method with Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR) for the multivariate characterization of honey’s chemical composition. In the first approach, the analysed parameters were: protein content (%), ascertainedby the Kjeldahl method; and apparent sucrose content (%), evaluated according to the regulatory standards of International Honey Commission. Partial least squares (PLS) regression was used to build the calibration model for these parameters, in comparison to the data obtained with the reference methods. For the 150 Lavandula honey samples two different methodologies were tested: i) a calibration with cross validation followed by ii) a cross validation (70% of the samples) with a test set (remaining 30% of the samples). The obtained models of suitable accuracy for protein content presented an r2 ranging from 96.7% to 81.8% (RPD = 5.5 to 2.4) for FTIR-ATR and between 89.4% and 77.6% (RPD = 3.1 to 2.1) for NIR. Concerning sucrose content, r2 was between 96.9% and 70.0% (RPD = 5.7 to 1.9) for FTIR-ATR, and between 88.5% and 64.4% (RPD = 3.0 to 1.9) for NIR. The root means square error of cross validation and prediction was lower using FTIR-ATR. The precision achieved using these two parameters suggests that the infrared spectroscopy is a suitable technique for the characterization of honey samples. However, in general, FTIR-ATR appeared to be the most accurate method. Different models are in development for other chemical parameters comparing these two techniques.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipCentro de Estudos Florestais is a Research Unit funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia within UID/AGR/UI0239/2013pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationAnjos, Ofélia; Pereira, Ana Paula; Santos, António J.A.; Estevinho, Letícia M. (2016). Comparison between FTIR-ATR and NIR spectroscopy for Lavandula honey characterization. In Gomes, Helder; Ferreira, Olga ; Barreira, João C.M.; Amaral, J.S. (Ed.) XXII Encontro Luso-Galego de Química: livro de resumos. Bragança: Sociedade Portuguesa de Química. ISBN 978-989-8124-17-3pt_PT
dc.identifier.isbn978-989-8124-17-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/17289
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.titleComparison between FTIR-ATR and NIR spectroscopy for Lavandula honey characterizationpt_PT
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/3599-PPCDT/Incentivo%2FAGR%2FUI0239%2F2013/PT
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceBragança, Portugal.pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleXXII Encontro Luso-Galego de Químicapt_PT
oaire.fundingStream3599-PPCDT
person.familyNamePereira
person.familyNameEstevinho
person.givenNameAna Paula
person.givenNameLetícia M.
person.identifier.ciencia-id1413-70AA-CDF6
person.identifier.ciencia-idBA14-09D6-A406
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1489-5207
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9249-1948
person.identifier.scopus-author-id54401473200
person.identifier.scopus-author-id6506577664
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione7df6eac-d667-415d-abdb-9fe17467475c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4a1d5ba2-1854-4ca5-89a4-73f35e964df9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4a1d5ba2-1854-4ca5-89a4-73f35e964df9
relation.isProjectOfPublicationa99f3ce8-4682-40c8-8cd0-36dcde900247
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya99f3ce8-4682-40c8-8cd0-36dcde900247

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Comparison between FTIR-ATR.pdf
Size:
565.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: