Biblioteca Digital do IPB >
Escola Superior Agrária >
Ambiente e Recursos Naturais >
ARN - Resumos em Proceedings Não Indexados ao ISI >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Título: ||Interrill erosion in shrub areas of Montesinho Natural Park: results of a rainfall simulation field study|
|Autor: ||Figueiredo, Tomás de|
|Palavras-chave: ||Interril erosion|
Montesinho Natural Park
|Issue Date: ||2008|
|Editora: ||Celeste de Oliveira Alves Coelho|
|Resumo: ||Vegetation communities known as shrubs cover around one third of the 750km2 of Montesinho Natural Park
(PNM), located in NE Portugal. Those communities are grouped according to the dominant species in:
“estevais” (Cistus ladanifer), “giestais” (Cytisus striatus), and “urzais” (Erica umbellata). In spite of the
different phyto-sociological significance of each one of these groups, shrubs are stable elements of PNM
Due to the large areas covered and also to their spatial distribution within PNM, shrubs play an important
role in hydrological processes and soil protection in such a mountainous territory.
Research leading to this presentation is part of a project designed and carried out to better know PNM shrub
areas in terms of: (i) soil erosion risk; (ii) C sequestration in soil and vegetation strata; (iii) C dynamics in
these systems. The presentation addresses to the first objective mentioned.
Based on the vegetation map of PNM, an experimental site was selected to conduct field work, which
accommodated in a short spatial range the design requirements: single soil type, a range of slope gradients,
the three main vegetation communities.
Field work comprised rainfall simulation runs with a portable spray-nozzle simulator calibrated for intensity
and raindrop distribution and kinetic energy of simulated rain showers. Each run included: 30min rain over a
square meter plot representing the vegetation community; runoff and washed sediment measurements in
10min steps; vegetation height and cover percentage; below and above ground vegetation biomass; organic
soil horizon thickness; local average slope gradient; soil sampling down to 30cm depth; rock fragment
contents. C content was determined by ignition loss in vegetation components, organic horizon and soil
layers. Prior to runs soil was sampled for moisture content.
Runs, 36 in total, were carried out according to experimental design; 3 vegetation communities (“estevais”,
“giestais”, “urzais”), 3 topographic positions (slope gradient low, 5%; medium, 15%; high, 24%), 3
replicates. A run where vegetation and organic horizon were entirely removed was also carried out on each
one of the vegetation communities and topographic positions. This allowed the assessment of potential
Global runoff and soil loss results rank vegetation communities as follows: “estevais” > “urzais” > “giestais”.
Yet, “giestais” showed clearly lower runoff than the other, while “estevais” had clearly higher soil loss than
the other. Average runoff, but not soil loss, increased with slope gradient. Vegetation and topographic effects
on runoff and soil loss are not statistically significant. The general pattern for runoff is found in medium and
high slope; vegetation communities rank differently in low slope (“urzais” > “estevais” > “giestais”). For soil
loss, in medium and high slope the rank is the latter one; in low slope “estevais” lost more soil and “urzais”
Canopy characteristics partly explain results obtained namely the size and distribution of leaves. Local
factors also contribute to explain results, such as: organic horizon (thicker in “estevais” and shallower in
“urzais”; decreasing thickness with slope increase), antecedent soil moisture (higher in “urzais” and lower in
“giestais”) and estimated surface roughness (higher in “giestais” and “urzais”).|
|Arbitragem científica: ||yes|
|Appears in Collections:||ARN - Resumos em Proceedings Não Indexados ao ISI|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.