Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10198/23022| Title: | The influence of the frontal surface area and swim velocity variation in front crawl active drag |
| Author: | Morais, J.E. Sanders, Ross H. Papic, Christopher Barbosa, Tiago M. Marinho, D.A. |
| Keywords: | Swimming Underwater Cameras Drag |
| Issue Date: | 2020 |
| Publisher: | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
| Citation: | Morais, J.E.; Sanders, Ross H.; Papic, Christopher; Barbosa, Tiago M.; Marinho, D.A. (2020). The influence of the frontal surface area and swim velocity variation in front crawl active drag. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. ISSN 0195-9131. 52:11, p. 2357-2364 |
| Abstract: | Purpose The aims of this study were to 1) compare active drag (D-a) calculation between a single land-based measurement of frontal surface area (FSA) and in-water FSA measures obtained at key events of the arm pull (1, right upper-limb catch; 2, right upper-limb insweep; 3, right upper-limb exit and left upper-limb catch; 4, left upper-limb insweep; and 5, left upper-limb exit and right upper-limb catch) at front crawl swimming, and 2) compare mechanical power variables computed based on these two approaches. Methods Seventeen swimmers (11, male; 6, female; 16.15 +/- 0.94 yr old) were recruited. The FSA was measured based on two approaches: (i) nonvariation, that is, assuming a constant value, and (ii) variation, that is, calculated in each key event of the front crawl swim. Active drag based on a nonvariation of the FSA was measured using the Velocity Perturbation method. Active drag based on a variation approach was measured in each key event of the front crawl according to the law of linear motion. Pairedt-test (P <= 0.05), simple linear regression models, and Bland-Altman plots between assessment methods (variation vs nonvariation) were computed. Results The FSA (variation) was higher than when assuming a nonvariation (0.1110 +/- 0.010 vs 0.0968 +/- 0.010 m(2), Delta = 15.69%,t= 4.40,P< 0.001,d= 0.95). Active drag (variation) was also significantly higher than when assuming a nonvariation (88.44 +/- 25.92 vs 75.41 +/- 15.11 N, Delta = 16.09%,t= 3.66,P= 0.002,d= 0.61). Conclusions Besides the FSA, swim velocity also changes during the front crawl arm pull. The variation of both variables had a significant effect on the active drag measurement and consequently on mechanical power and total power input variables. |
| Peer review: | yes |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10198/23022 |
| DOI: | 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002400 |
| ISSN: | 0195-9131 |
| Appears in Collections: | ESE - Artigos em Revistas Indexados à WoS/Scopus |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The_Influence_of_the_Frontal_Surface_Area_and_Swim.10.pdf | 657,03 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.











